Ex parte ESPIE et al. - Page 13




          Appeal No. 1997-4111                                      Page 13           
          Application No. 08/540,947                                                  


          plug 40), a molding surface (Cain's face 38) at one end, at                 
          least one groove (Cain's grooves 42) formed in the side                     
          surface, each such groove extending from the end opposite the               
          molding surface to a point spaced apart from the molding                    
          surface (as shown in Figures 3 and 3A Cain's grooves 42 extend              
          from the end opposite face 38 to a point spaced apart from                  
          face 38), the side surface at said one surface being without                
          grooves (Cain's side surface on head portion 24 is without                  
          grooves), and complementary to the surrounding surface                      
          defining the hole (Cain's head portion 24 is complementary to               
          counterbore 16).                                                            


               The appellants argue (brief, pp. 17-18; reply brief, pp.               
          3-6) that Cain does not anticipate claim 7.  They point out                 
          that since Cain includes a gap 18 formed between the                        
          counterbore 16 and the vent plug 20 Cain's vent plug 20 would               
          not be "complementary to the surrounding surface defining the               
          hole."                                                                      
          We do not agree.                                                            










Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007