Appeal No. 1997-4111 Page 13 Application No. 08/540,947 plug 40), a molding surface (Cain's face 38) at one end, at least one groove (Cain's grooves 42) formed in the side surface, each such groove extending from the end opposite the molding surface to a point spaced apart from the molding surface (as shown in Figures 3 and 3A Cain's grooves 42 extend from the end opposite face 38 to a point spaced apart from face 38), the side surface at said one surface being without grooves (Cain's side surface on head portion 24 is without grooves), and complementary to the surrounding surface defining the hole (Cain's head portion 24 is complementary to counterbore 16). The appellants argue (brief, pp. 17-18; reply brief, pp. 3-6) that Cain does not anticipate claim 7. They point out that since Cain includes a gap 18 formed between the counterbore 16 and the vent plug 20 Cain's vent plug 20 would not be "complementary to the surrounding surface defining the hole." We do not agree.Page: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007