Appeal No. 1997-4127 Page 4
Application No. 08/044,241
providing a first signal at an enabling value to
said enable input of said ROM and a second signal at
a disabling value to said enable input of said flash
EPROM when a cycle is executed to said primary boot
code and said selector providing a disabling value
on said first signal and an
enabling value on said second signal when a cycle is
executed to said other boot code or said other
system code.
The reference relied on in rejecting the claims follows:
Stewart et al. 5,471,674 Nov. 28, 1995
(Stewart) (filed Feb. 16,
1994).
Claims 15-17 and 19-21 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102(e) as anticipated by Stewart. Rather than repeat the
arguments of the appellants or examiner in toto, we refer the
reader to the briefs and answers for the respective details
thereof.
OPINION
In reaching our decision in this appeal, we considered
the subject matter on appeal and the rejection advanced by
the examiner. Furthermore, we duly considered the arguments
and evidence of the appellants and examiner. After
considering the totality of the record, we are persuaded that
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007