The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte VISHAL MARKANDEY, STEPHEN W. MARSHALL,
DONALD B. DOHERTY, VADLAMANNATI VENKATESWAR, PAUL M. URBANUS
and ROBERT J. GOVE
____________
Appeal No. 1998-0662
Application No. 08/561,223
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and HECKER, Administrative Patent
Judges.
HECKER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1 through 20, all claims pending in this application.
The invention relates to displaying video data with a
spatial light modulator using interlaced video input data. In
particular, referring to Figure 1, a video signal is received
at input 11 and processed at processor 12 which includes an
analog- to-digital (A/D) converter. One field of pixel data
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007