Appeal No. 1998-0662
Application No. 08/561,223
line is provided to picture elements on the first and second
(i.e., adjacent) rows, and that the next gate shift clock
gates lines 3 and 4 simultaneously and the same line is
provided to picture elements on the third and fourth (i.e.,
adjacent) rows. Additionally we note column 7, lines 23-36,
for a similar teaching.
With respect to the claims reciting that the SM’s are
mirror devices, Appellants make no specific argument as to the
applicability of Stoltz for this teaching, and rely upon
previous arguments to support these claims (brief-pages 8 and
9).
In view of the forgoing, we will sustain the Examiner’s
rejection of claims 1, 8, 11 and 17 (all independent claims),
all of Appellants’ arguments pertaining thereto having been
considered supra.
With respect to claims 4 and 20, Appellants argue that
the references do not teach the two adjacent lines receiving
the same data (brief-pages 5 and 10). We have addressed this
point supra and will sustain the Examiner’s rejection of these
claims.
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007