THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written
for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ISAO TSUKAGOSHI, YUTAKA YAMAGUCHI, ATSUO NAKAJIMA and
YASUSHI GOTO
____________
Appeal No. 1998-0786
Application No. 08/464,118
____________
HEARD: January 12, 2000
____________
Before KIMLIN, GARRIS, and PAK, Administrative Patent Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s
refusal to allow claims 2, 5 and 7, as amended subsequent to
the final Office action dated September 3, 1996, Paper No. 8.
These claims are all of the claims pending in the present
application since claims 4 and 6 were canceled subsequent to
the final Office action.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007