The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte MINORI TAKAGI,
KOUJI ARAMAKI,
and
TAKESHI IKEDA
_____________
Appeal No. 1998-0922
Application No. 08/386,862
______________
HEARD: OCTOBER 26, 2000
_______________
Before FLEMING, RUGGIERO, and LALL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection
of claims 5, 6, and 8-18, all of the claims pending in the
present application. Claims 1-4 and 7 have been canceled.
The claimed invention relates to a video tape recorder
(VTR) with a monitor-equipped built-in camera. The video tape
recorder includes a monitor/VTR portion which is integrally
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007