Appeal No. 1998-0922
Application No. 08/386,862
Since it is our opinion, for at least the reasons
discussed above, that the Examiner has failed to establish a
prima facie case of obviousness, we do not sustain the
Examiner’s 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 rejection of independent claims 5 and 16-18, nor of
claims 6 and 8-15 dependent thereon. Accordingly, the
Examiner’s decision rejecting claims 5, 6, and 8-18 is
reversed.
REVERSED
)
MICHAEL R. FLEMING )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
PARSHOTAM S. LALL )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JFR:hh
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007