Appeal No. 1998-1319 Application No. 08/466,188 voltages. However, the examiner has provided no reason from the prior art as to why one of ordinary skill would have been motivated to modify APA to include the additional elements. Merely that the elements exist in the art and that the prior art can be modified in the manner suggested by the examiner does not make the modification obvious unless the prior art suggested the desirability of the modification. In re Fritch, 972 F.2d 1260, 1266, 23 USPQ2d 1780, 1783-4 (Fed. Cir. 1992). Therefore, the examiner has not properly combined APA, Suzuki, and Arai. Consequently, we must reverse the rejection of claims 9, 10, 15, and 18 through 44 over APA in view of Suzuki and Arai. As to the obviousness rejection over Aoki, Figure 5 of Aoki shows that different gradations are produced by various combinations of voltages supplied to the liquid crystal. For each horizontal scan period, plural voltages output by the voltage generator may be selected, and each applied for a portion of the period. Thus, the selected output voltage is not constant over the entire horizontal scanning period. Accordingly, we must reverse the rejection of claims 9, 10, 15, 28, 29, and 34 through 44 which specify that the voltage 10Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007