Appeal No. 1998-1319
Application No. 08/466,188
present claims 18 through 27 are unpatentable over patent
claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 12, and 14 through 18, respectively.
Consequently, we will affirm the obviousness-type double
patenting rejection of claims 18 through 27.
CONCLUSION
The decision of the examiner rejecting claims 9, 10, 15,
and 18 through 44 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over APA, Arai, and
Suzuki is reversed. The decision of the examiner rejecting
claims 9, 10, 15, and 18 through 44 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over
Aoki is affirmed as to claims 18, 19, 23, 30, and 32, and
reversed as to claims 9, 10, 15, and 20 through 22, 24 through
29, 31, and 33 through 44. The decision of the examiner
rejecting claims 9, 10, 15, and 18 through 44 under the
doctrine of obviousness-type double patenting is affirmed as
to claims 18 through 27 and reversed as to claims 9, 10, 15,
and 28 through 44.
18
Page: Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007