Appeal No. 1998-1323
Application 08/252,861
receiving a plurality of representative frames
representing information contained in the first information-
bearing component;
receiving a signal having information that forms a
correspondence between each of the representative frames and a
segment of the second information-bearing media component; and
displaying said representative frames and said segment
of the second information-bearing media component in a manner
determined by said correspondence therebetween.
The examiner relies on the following references:
Takahashi et al. (Takahashi) 5,428,774 June 27, 1995
(filed Mar. 16,
1993)
Buhro et al. (Buhro) 5,440,336 Aug. 08, 1995
(filed July 23,
1993)
Cragun et al. (Cragun) 5,481,296 Jan. 02, 1996
(filed Aug. 06,
1993)
Claims 1-24 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103. As
evidence of obviousness the examiner offers Takahashi in view
of Buhro and Cragun. Claim 25 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102(e) as being anticipated by the disclosure of Cragun.
Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the
examiner, we make reference to the briefs and the answer for
the respective details thereof.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007