The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 22 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte STEVEN F. GILLIG and GLENN E. PEDERSON ____________ Appeal No. 1998-1491 Application No. 08/654,502 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before BARRETT, RUGGIERO, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the rejection of claims 30-57. We reverse. BACKGROUND The invention at issue in this appeal relates to cordless and cellular telephones. Cordless telephones typically are used to place and receive telephone calls throughout a house. Such cordless telephones are connected to a user's telephonePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007