Appeal No. 1998-1895 Page 14 Application No. 08/425,990 Relying on Ohsawa and Toriu for the aforementioned reasons, the examiner fails to allege, let alone show, that either reference cures the deficiency of Schreiber, van der Wal, AAPA, and Carnahan. Because AAPA and Carnahan teach performing an inverse wavelet transform only on data resulting from a wavelet transform, we are not persuaded that teachings from the prior art would have suggested the limitations of "synthesizing a pair of high-frequency images by filtering said horizontal edge image and said vertical edge image with an edge synthesis filter ... and performing an inverse wavelet transform on said decoded lowfrequency image and said pair of high-frequency images"; "synthesizing a pair of high-frequency images by filtering said horizontal edge image horizontally with an edge synthesis filter, and filtering said vertical edge image vertically with said edge synthesis filter; ... performing an inverse wavelet transform on said high-frequency images and said low-frequency image, thereby obtaining said digitized image"; or "synthesizing a pair of high-frequency images by filtering said pair of edge images with an edge synthesis filter; and an inverse wavelet transform processor, coupled to said up sampler and said edge synthesizer, forPage: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007