Appeal No. 1998-1895 Page 15
Application No. 08/425,990
performing an inverse wavelet transform on said decoded low-
frequency image and said pair of high-frequency images,
thereby obtaining said digitized image." For the foregoing
reasons, we reverse the rejection of claims 1-5, 15-19, 26,
and 79 as obvious over Schreiber in view of van der Wal
further in view of Carnahan or AAPA; the rejection of claims 6
and 8 as obvious over Schreiber in view of van der Wal further
in view of Carnahan or AAPA even further in view of Ohsawa;
and the rejection of claims 9, 10, 12-14, 27-33, and 80-86 as
obvious over Schreiber in view of van der Wal further in view
of Carnahan or AAPA even further in view of Toriu.
CONCLUSION
In summary, the rejection of claims 1-5, 15-19, 26, and
79 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as obvious over Schreiber in view of
van der Wal further in view of Carnahan or AAPA is reversed.
The rejection of claims 6 and 8 under § 103 as obvious over
Schreiber in view of van der Wal further in view of Carnahan
or AAPA even further in view of Ohsawa is also reversed. In
addition, the rejection of claims 9, 10, 12-14, 27-33, and 80-
86 under § 103 as obvious over Schreiber in view of van der
Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007