Ex parte TOYAMA et al. - Page 6




          Appeal No. 1998-1915                                       Page 6           
          Application No. 08/670,123                                                  


          at 10.)                                                                     


               Claims 11-18 specify in pertinent part the following                   
          limitations: "supply a first alternating-current electric                   
          power to the discharge lamp during a time interval immediately              
          after activation of the discharge lamp, ...  supply a second                
          alternating-current electric power to the discharge lamp after              
          the time interval elapses; wherein the second alternating-                  
          current electric power has a frequency higher than a frequency              
          of the first alternating-current electric power."                           
          Accordingly, the claims require supplying a low frequency AC                
          power to a discharge lamp immediately after the lamp is                     
          activated and, after a time, supplying a higher frequency AC                
          power to the lamp.                                                          


               The examiner fails to show a teaching or suggestion of                 
          the limitations in the prior art.  Although Yamashita                       
          discloses supplying a low frequency "AC voltage of a                        
          rectangular waveform", col. 4, ll. 64-65, to a discharge lamp               
          and, after a time, supplying a higher frequency AC voltage of               
          a rectangular waveform thereto, the low frequency waveform is               







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007