Appeal No. 1998-2102
Application 08/826,039
17 by Mishiro. We have also sustained the obviousness
rejection of claims 17 to 22 over Iijima. However, we have
not sustained the anticipation rejection of claim 16 by
Ohnishi, claim 16 by Yamaguchi (including the alternative
obviousness rejection), and claims 16, and 24 to 28, and 30 by
Mishiro. We have also not sustained the obviousness rejection
of claim 16 over Iijima, and claims 24 to 28 and 30 over
Ohnishi.
Accordingly, the decision of the Examiner rejecting
claims 16 to 22, 24 to 28, and 30 is affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in
connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR
§ 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
JAMES D. THOMAS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
ERROL A. KRASS ) BOARD OF
-13-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007