Appeal No. 1998-2142 Page 4
Application No. 08/125,189
The references relied on in rejecting the claims follow:
Nakajima et al. (Nakajima) 4,395,109 July 26,
1983
Kogure et al. (Kogure) 4,813,372 Mar. 21,
1989
Satomura 5,628,183 Dec. 9,
1986
Yamamoto et al. (Yamamoto) 5,182,606 Jan. 26,
1993
filed Oct. 5, 1991.
Claims 3-6, 8-10, 12, 13, 15, 16 and 18-33 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Nakajima in view of
Satomura. Claim 7 stands rejected under § 103(a) as obvious
over Nakajima in view of Satomura further in view of Yamamoto.
Claim 17 stands rejected under § 103(a) as obvious over
Nakajima in view of Satomura further in view of Kogure.
Rather than repeat the arguments of the appellants or examiner
in toto, we refer the reader to the briefs and answer for the
respective details thereof.
OPINION
In deciding this appeal, we considered the subject matter
on appeal and the rejection advanced by the examiner.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007