Ex parte AKUTSU et al. - Page 12




          Appeal No. 1998-2142                                      Page 12           
          Application No. 08/125,189                                                  


          6, 8-10, 12, 13, 15, 16 and 18-33 as obvious over Nakajima in               
          view of Satomura; the rejection of claim 7 as obvious over                  
          Nakajima in view of Satomura further in view of Yamamoto; and               
          the rejection of claim 17 as obvious over Nakajima in view of               
          Satomura further in view of Kogure.                                         


                                     CONCLUSION                                       
               In summary, the rejection of claims 3-6, 8-10, 12, 13,                 
          15, 16 and 18-33 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over                   
          Nakajima in view of Satomura is reversed.  The rejection of                 
          claim 7 under § 103(a) as obvious over Nakajima in view of                  
          Satomura further in view of Yamamoto is also reversed.  In                  
          addition, the rejection of claim 17 under § 103(a) as obvious               
          over Nakajima in view of Satomura further in view of Kogure is              
          reversed.                                                                   

















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007