Appeal No. 1998-2537
Application 08/680,602
Since claims 2 through 4 depend from claim 1 and include all
of the limitations of claim 1, we will also not sustain the
examiner’s rejection of these claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a).
In summary, we will not sustain the examiner’s
rejection of claims 1 through 4 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Graham in view of Huber. Therefore,
the decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
HARRISON E. McCANDLISH )
Senior Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF
PATENT
IRWIN CHARLES COHEN ) APPEALS
AND
Administrative Patent Judge )
INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007