Ex parte GARBER et al. - Page 1






                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                  
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                    
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                  
                                                            Paper No. 12              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    _____________                                     
                    Ex parte SHARON R. GARBER, CRAIG E. COLTON,                       
                                 LARRY L. JANSSEN                                     
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1998-2815                                  
                               Application 08/648,790                                 
                                   ______________                                     
                              HEARD: February 15, 2000                                
                                   _______________                                    

          Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, and                       
          McCandlish, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and FRANKFORT,              
          Administrative Patent Judge.                                                
          FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                     


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   


               This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final                 
          rejection of claims 1-48, all of the claims pending in this                 
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007