Ex parte ITO et al. - Page 3




                 Appeal No. 1998-2836                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08/453,211                                                                                                             


                 Sumita                  5,180,426               Jan. 19, 1993                                                                          
                 Oonishi et al.          5,223,029                                                    Jun. 29, 1993                                     
                 (Oonishi)                                 (filed Apr. 9, 1990)                                                                         
                 Ito                        EP 329,098                                                Aug. 23, 1989                                     
                 (published application)                                                                                                                
                 The appealed claims stand finally rejected under 35                                                                                    
                 U.S.C.                                                                                                                                 
                 § 103(a) on the following grounds:                                                                                                     
                 (1) Claims 1 through 3 and 16 through 23, unpatentable over                                                                            
                 Ito in view of Oonishi; and                                                                                                            
                 (2) Claims 8 through 11, unpatentable over Ito in view of                                                                              
                 Oonishi, and further in view of Sumita.                                                                                                


                          2(...continued)                                                                                                               
                 useful for reconstruction of skeletal or other osseous                                                                                 
                 defects, bone plates and replacement of corticocancellous                                                                              
                 strips.  See, e.g., col. 2, ll. 6-21 and col. 5, ll. 24-33.                                                                            
                          Nagal (Published EPO Application No. 0 253 506) teaching                                                                      
                 a substitute bone material comprising a ceramic material of                                                                            
                 natural powdery or particulate hydroxyapatite obtained from                                                                            
                 cow bones calcined at a temperature around 800EC.  See, e.g.,                                                                          
                 col. 3, ll. 24-48 and compare to page 9, lines 4-8 of the                                                                              
                 appellants’ specification.  Nagal is particularly relevant to                                                                          
                 appealed claims 1 and 18.                                                                                                              
                          These referenced documents would appear to us to be                                                                           
                 worthy of further consideration in the event of any subsequent                                                                         
                 prosecution before the examiner.                                                                                                       


                                                                           3                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007