THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered
today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte TEDDY J. HIRSCH and DON L. IVEY
________________
Appeal No. 1999-1037
Application 08/804,284
________________
HEARD: FEBRUARY 22, 2000
________________
Before ABRAMS, STAAB and BAHR, Administrative Patent Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1, 3, 4, 11, 12 and 15. Claims 20-22, the
only other claims remaining in the application, have been
allowed. An amendment filed subsequent to the final rejection
on April 24, 1998 has been entered.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007