THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 19
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SATISH SUNDAR
____________
Appeal No. 1999-1759
Application No. 08/749,614
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before CALVERT, COHEN, and FRANKFORT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING
This is in response to appellant's request for
reconsideration (rehearing) of our decision mailed April 4,
2000, wherein we affirmed the examiner's rejection of claims 1
through 4, 6 through 14, 17 through 21, 23 through 31 and 34
through 46 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over
Tada in view of Lucas and Lowrance.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007