Ex parte WINDLE - Page 5




          Appeal No. 1999-1763                                                        
          Application No. 08/834,931                                                  


          Price                    2 151 949 A              July 31, 1985             
          (GB)                                                                        



               As stated in the final rejection (Paper No. 5), claim 1                
          stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated               
          by Price; claims 2 through 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §               
          103(a) as being obvious over Price; and claims 1 through 8                  
          stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 101 as being non-statutory.                


               Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced              
          by the examiner and the appellant regarding the above-noted                 
          rejections, we make reference to the final rejection (Paper                 
          No. 5, mailed April 13, 1998) and the examiner’s answer (Paper              
          No. 10, mailed September 29, 1998) for the examiner’s complete              
          reasoning in support of the rejection, and to the appellant’s               
          brief (Paper No. 9, filed July 10, 1998) and reply brief                    
          (Paper No. 11, filed October 26, 1998) for the arguments                    
          thereagainst.                                                               


                                       OPINION                                        


                                          5                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007