Ex parte RUDDUCK et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      

               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                     
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the                        
               Board.                                                                 
                                                               Paper No. 33           
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                    ____________                                      
                   Ex parte DICKORY RUDDUCK and LEONARD JOHN DWYER                    
                                    ____________                                      
                                Appeal No. 1999-2186                                  
                             Application No. 08/857,571                               
                                    ____________                                      
                                HEARD: April 19, 2000                                 
                                    ____________                                      

          Before CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge, MCCANDLISH,                    
          Senior Administrative Patent Judge, and PATE, Administrative                
          Patent Judge.                                                               
          CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       


                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1,                
          2, 5, 6, 9 to 14, 16 to 19 and 21 to 48, all the claims                     
          remaining in the application.                                               









Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007