THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 22 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte FRITZ RUPFLIN _____________ Appeal No. 1999-2542 Application 08/832,654 ______________ HEARD _______________ Before COHEN, MCQUADE, and GONZALES, Administrative Patent Judges. COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 4 through 6 and 8 through 10, as amended subsequent to that rejection. These claims constitute all of the claims 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007