Ex parte RUPFLIN - Page 2




                 Appeal No. 1999-2542                                                                                                                   
                 Application No. 08/832654                                                                                                              


                 remaining in the application.                                                                                                          


                          Appellant’s invention pertains to a connector rod for a                                                                       
                 loom.  An understanding of the invention can be derived from a                                                                         
                 reading of exemplary claim 4, a copy of which appears in                                                                               
                 “APPENDIX: A” appended to the main brief (Paper No. 16).                                                                               


                          As evidence of obviousness, the examiner has applied the                                                                      
                 documents listed below:                                                                                                                
                 Nicholas                                     2,096,335                                             Oct. 19,                            
                 1937                                                                                                                                   
                 Vinciguerra                                  4,770,584                                             Sep. 13,                            
                 1988                                                                                                                                   
                 Winnie                                       5,004,361                                             Apr.  2,                            
                 1991                                                                                                                                   

                 Corain et al.                                         2,621,262                                             Jul.                       
                 14, 1989                                                                                                                               
                 (Corain)(France) 1                                                                                                                     


                          The following rejections, found in the examiner’s answer                                                                      
                 (Paper No. 17), are before us for review.                                                                                              

                          1Our understanding of this foreign language document is                                                                       
                 derived from a reading of a translation thereof prepared in                                                                            
                 the United States Patent and Trademark Office. A copy of the                                                                           
                 translation is appended to this opinion.                                                                                               
                                                                           2                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007