Appeal No. 1999-2542
Application No. 08/832654
entirety, as above, and fully taken into account the point of
view of the examiner as expressed in the answer, for the
reasons articulated herein we are constrained to conclude that
the evidence before us simply does not support a conclusion of
obviousness.
In summary, this panel of the board has:
reversed the rejection of claims 4 through 6 and 8
through 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over
Corain in view of Nicholas; and
reversed the rejection of claims 4 through 6 and 8 through 10
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Winnie in
view of Nicholas and Vinciguerra.
No time period for taking any subsequent action
in connection with this appeal may be extended under
37 CFR § 1.136(a).
REVERSED
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007