Offenlegungsschrift DE 3,622,746 (DE ‘746), published
January 21, 1988;
b) German Offenlegungsschrift DE 4,333,503 (DE ‘503),
published April 6, 1995, in view of EP ‘400 and DE ‘746;
or
c) U.S. patent 5,401,041 (US ‘041), issued March 28,
1995 in view of EP ‘400 and DE ‘746 . (Paper 13½ at 8- 2
20).
7. Okajima, in its brief, submits that Bourdeau’s
claims 13-24 and 26-28 are unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103
over DE ‘503 and/or US ‘041 in view of EP ‘400 alone or in
combination with DE ‘746, Austrian publication 399 637 B (AT
‘637), or U.S. patent US ‘622. (Paper 51 at 24).
8. In its brief, Okajima additionally argues that claim
17 is unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 112. (Paper 51 at 34).
Bourdeau’s Motion to Suppress
9. Bourdeau filed a motion to exclude Okajima’s
exhibits OX9, OX10, OX11, and OX12. (Paper 52).
10. Okajima’s exhibit OX9 is AT ‘637.
2Okajima argues that claim 19 is unpatentable based on
the third alternative only. (Paper 13½ at 13).
Okajima argues that claim 24 is unpatentable based on
the three alternatives. However, in the last alternative,
Okajima further relies on U.S. patent 3,584,622 (US ‘622),
issued June 15, 1971. (Paper 13 ½ at 16).
Okajima argues that claims 27 and 28 are unpatentable
based on the three alternatives, less the DE ‘746 reference.
(Paper 13 ½ at 18-20).
- 4 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007