Interference 103,482
Ewen’s point 2, assumes that Ewen’s claims 31
and 36 read on the homopolymerization of ethylene.
However, express language of these claims excludes
this interpretation. For example, claim 31 expressly
requires the formation of “syndio-isoblock polymer
having molecular chains in which syndiotactic and
isotactic sequences are present and the sequence length
is 3 to 50 monomer units....” This limitation excludes
homopolymerization of ethylene which would have no
syndiotactic or isotactic sequences. The claim, however,
does not exclude using ethylene as a comonomer.
MM. December 9, 1998 -- Dolle filed Motion To Strike
Under 37 CFR §1.635 (Paper No. 85) and Objections To Evidence
(Paper No. 86). Dolle moved to strike, and objected to the
admissibility of, the following evidence from Submission Of
Ewen et al Evidence-In-Chief (Paper No. 84), filed November
20, 1998:
(1) Declaration of William J. Gauthier, dated
September 28, 1998, including attachments A and B thereto
(Ewen Exhibit X);
(2) Second Declaration of William J. Gauthier, dated
November 19, 1998 (Ewen Exhibit Y), including Randall, James,
POLYMER SEQUENCE DETERMINATION Carbon-13 NMR Method, New York,
pp. 1-7 and 29-58 (1977)(Ewen Exhibit Z).
NN. June 30, 1999 -- Dolle filed Motion Under 37 CFR
§1.635 To Suppress Evidence (Paper No. 98). Dolle objected to
the admissibility, and moved to suppress, the following
38
Page: Previous 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007