Interference 103,482
polymers that do not have the requisite average sequence
length due to the particular process conditions do not
meet
the express limitations of the claim. The construction
is consistent with Dolle’s specification. See Dolle
Specification, p. 3, lines 5-12.
II. September 15, 1998 -- Redeclaration Of Interference
(Paper No. 78). The APJ redeclared the interference to
designate the claims of the parties which correspond to
substitute Count 2 (Appendix C) as follows (Paper No. 78, p.
2):
Claims of the parties
Ewen Patent 5,036,034 Claims 1-8
Application 08/489,800 Claims 1-28
Dolle Application 08/147,006 Claims 4-6, 8, 12-37
Claims of the parties corresponding to count 2
Ewen Patent 5,036,034 Claims 1-8
Application 08/489,800 Claims 1-28
Dolle Application 08/147,006 Claims 4, 5, 6, 8,
12-37
Claims of the parties not corresponding to count 2
Ewen None
Dolle None
JJ. October 15, 1998 -- Decision Returning Paper (Paper
No. 80). The APJ returned Ewen’s Request for Reconsideration
(Paper 79) of Decision on Dolle § 1.633(c)(2) Motion to
Redefine Interfering Subject Matter (Paper 77), and the
declaration
35
Page: Previous 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007