Appeal No. 2000-0142 Page 4 Application No. 08/705,569 voltage, a second input terminal coupled to the reference resistor, and an output, a low-pass filter coupled between the reference resistor and the second input terminal of the differential amplifier, a current amplifier for deriving a second current and having an input coupled to the output of the differential amplifier, and second means coupled to the current amplifier and to the first means for controlling the first current dependent upon the second current, and wherein the reference resistor is independent of and is not a part of the current amplifier. (Appeal Br. at 22.) Besides the appellants’ admitted prior art (“AAPA”), the prior art applied by the examiner in rejecting the claims follows: De La Plaza et al. (“De La Plaza”) 4,703,249 Oct. 27, 1987 Seki et al. (“Seki”) 4,017,749 Apr. 12, 1977. Claims 1-10, 14, 15, 19, and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 2, as being indefinite. (Final Rejection at 3.) Claims 18-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) asPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007