The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of
the Board.
Paper No. 10
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte ERIC OSTENDORFF, HELENA BARTOR and NATHAN C. PROCH
__________
Appeal No. 2000-0212
Application 08/914,477
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before CALVERT, ABRAMS, and NASE, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 to
16, all the claims in the application.
The claims on appeal are drawn to a toy vehicle, and are
reproduced in the appendix of appellants’ brief.1
1 In claim 1, line 2, we note that “front” should be
--frontal--, to provide proper antecedent basis.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007