Appeal No. 2000-0673 Application No. 08/960,276 persuasive. In our view, one of ordinary skill would have found ample suggestion to electrically deposit the collagen coating of McNamara in Vieth's teaching that (col. 2, lines 72 to 75): A unique advantage of the process of the present invention is that pre-shaped electrodes may be used, thus enabling uniform distribution of the immobilized enzyme-membrane complexes on irregularly shaped supports. Since the stent disclosed by McNamara is a helix, i.e., an "irregularly shaped" support, this disclosed advantage of the Vieth process would have motivated one of ordinary skill to select that process for coating the McNamara stent. Moreover, as the examiner notes, Vieth discloses in Example 2 the coating of a stainless steel wire helix which, although considerably larger than a stent, would have suggested using the Vieth process to coat other helically-shaped objects, such as the McNamara stent. Appellants note that at col. 8, lines 58 to 60, Vieth states that the coating on the helix disintegrated after four runs. However, we do not consider that this would dissuade one of ordinary skill from electrodepositing the coating on the McNamara stent, given the above-discussed advantage 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007