Appeal No. 2000-0917 Page 3
Application No. 09/104,763
Claims 1-3, 6, 7, 9/1, 9/2, 9/3, 9/6, 9/7, 11/1, 11/2,
11/3, 11/6 and 11/7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Villanueva in view of Curley.
Claims 5, 9/5 and 11/5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103 as being unpatentable over Villanueva in view of Curley
and Davis.
Claims 8, 9/8 and 11/8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. §
103 as being unpatentable over Villanueva in view of Curley
and Dixon.
Claims 10/1, 10/2, 10/3, 10/6 and 10/7 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Villanueva in
view of Curley and Rogowski.
Claim 10/5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Villanueva in view of Curley, Davis and
Rogowski.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007