Appeal No. 2000-0917 Page 14
Application No. 09/104,763
For the reasons set forth above, the decision of the
examiner to reject claim 1, and claims 2, 3 and 5 to 11
dependent thereon, under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.3
3We have also reviewed the references to Davis, Dixon and
Rogowski additionally applied in the rejection of some of the
dependent claims but find nothing therein which makes up for
the deficiencies of Villanueva and Curley discussed above
regarding claim 1.
Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007