The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte KIM SVERKER IMMANUEL PETTERSSON
and TIMO NILS-ERIK LUVGREN
________________
Appeal No. 2001-1412
Application No. 08/629,1771
________________
ON BRIEF
________________
Before: TORCZON, SPIEGEL and GARDNER-LANE, Administrative Patent Judges.
SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1 through 4, 7 through 17 and 20 through 54, which are all of the claims
pending in this application. Claims 1, 2 and 15 are illustrative and are attached as an
appendix to this decision.
The examiner relies upon the following references as evidence of obviousness:
Application for patent filed April 8, 1996.1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007