BRAKE v. SINGH - Page 10




                Interference 102,728                                                                                                          
                         9.      We find the following testimony by Dr. Tekamp-Olson credible:                                                
                                 3.      Based upon my review of the Brake 1 patent application it clearly                                    
                         discloses Saccharomyces "-factor constructs for secretory expression of                                              
                         heterologous genes which constructs lack a dipeptidylaminopeptidase A (“DPAP                                         
                         A”) site.  This is disclosed in Brake 1 on page 3, line 33 to page 4, line 14; and in                                
                         the claims page 16, lines 22 and 32.  In particular, the fact that “n” can be zero in                                
                         the formulae tells me (as well as those of ordinary skill as of 1983), that the                                      
                         DPAP A site is optional and can be deleted.  Tekamp-Olson declaration, p. 2,                                         
                         para. 3.                                                                                                             
                         10.     Brake argued that one skilled in the art would have been able to make                                        
                and use the n=0 construct disclosed in the ‘325 Application using the well-known                                              
                technique of site-directed mutagenesis (a.k.a. in vitro or oligonucleotide mutagenesis),                                      
                at the time the application was filed.  Paper No. 15, pp. 10-12.                                                              
                         11.     Brake relied, inter alia, on the declaration testimony of Dr. Patricia                                       
                Tekamp-Olson (para. 5a) to establish that the site-directed mutagenesis technique was                                         
                available and known to those skilled in the art by January, 1983.  Paper No. 15, pp. 11-                                      
                12.                                                                                                                           
                         12.     Dr. Tekamp-Olson credibly states:                                                                            
                                 5.      For example, such constructs could have been made using in vitro                                     
                         mutagenesis, a technique extensively used by January 1983 to modify DNA.                                             
                         This technique could have been performed on the construct exemplified in the                                         
                         Brake 1 application.  The in vitro mutagenesis procedure disclosed in Brake 2                                        
                         was available in January 1983.  It would have been apparent to one of ordinary                                       
                         skill in January 1983 to apply the technique to the material disclosed in Brake 1                                    
                         to produce a construct of the count, namely a construct lacking the DPAP A site.                                     
                                 a.      To perform in vitro mutagenesis on the construct py"EGF-21 or                                        
                         according to the Brake 1, pYEGF-8 disclosed in Brake 1 it would have been                                            
                         apparent and within the level of ordinary skill in 1983 to (1) digest the construct                                  
                         with BamHI; (2) subclone the BamHI digest into an M13 vector; (3) mutagenized                                        
                         [sic, mutagenize] the M13 vector with a primer lacking the DPAP A site; (4)                                          
                         screen the mutagenized M13 vector with the primer to isolate a clone lacking the                                     

                                                                     10                                                                       





Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007