Ex parte STEARNS et al. - Page 1




          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
                   publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.             
                                                            Paper No. 38              


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                              Ex parte GLENN STEARNS,                                 
                                BARBARA B. PACKARD,                                   
                                        and                                           
                                   RALPH T. WATSON                                    
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1996-2581                                  
                             Application No. 08/288,139                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                     ON BRIEF                                         
                                   ______________                                     
          Before BARRETT, RUGGIERO, and GROSS, Administrative Patent                  
          Judges.                                                                     
          RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      

                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection              
          of claims 8-11, 13, 14, 26, and 27.  Claims 2-7 and 12 have                 
          been allowed, and claims 1 and 15-25 have been canceled.                    
               The claimed invention relates to the recording and                     
          monitoring of commands executed by a computer.  More                        
          particularly, rather than recording user actions at a “syntax”              






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007