The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 38 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte GLENN STEARNS, BARBARA B. PACKARD, and RALPH T. WATSON _____________ Appeal No. 1996-2581 Application No. 08/288,139 ______________ ON BRIEF ______________ Before BARRETT, RUGGIERO, and GROSS, Administrative Patent Judges. RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of claims 8-11, 13, 14, 26, and 27. Claims 2-7 and 12 have been allowed, and claims 1 and 15-25 have been canceled. The claimed invention relates to the recording and monitoring of commands executed by a computer. More particularly, rather than recording user actions at a “syntax”Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007