Appeal No. 1996-2581
Application No. 08/288,139
In conclusion, since the Examiner has not established a
prima facie case of obviousness, the rejection of independent
claims 8, 13, 26, and 27, and claims 9-11 and 14 dependent
thereon, over Barstow is not sustained. Therefore, the
decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 8-11, 13, 14, 26,
and 27 is reversed.
REVERSED
LEE E. BARRETT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
ANITA PELLMAN GROSS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JFR:hh
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007