Appeal No. 1996-2581
Application No. 08/288,139
of the images on the viewing screen, each of the
semantic commands identifying an entity being
operated on, where identification of the entity is
independent of location of the images on the viewing
screen, and
command processor process for receiving the
semantic commands from the action processor and for
executing the semantic commands; and
recording means for receiving first semantic
commands executed by a first command processor from
the plurality of application processes, and for
recording the first semantic commands in a file, the
first semantic commands, after being recorded in the
file, giving a history of semantic commands
previously executed by the first command processor
process.
The Examiner relies on the following prior art:
Barstow et al. (Barstow) 4,827,404 May 02,
1989
(filed Apr. 14, 1986)
Claims 8-11, 13, 14, 26, and 27 stand finally rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Barstow.
Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants and the
Examiner, reference is made to the Brief (Paper No. 31) and
Answer (Paper No. 32) for the respective details.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on
appeal, the rejection advanced by the Examiner, and the
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007