Ex Parte HOSAKA - Page 1



            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not        
            written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.        
                                                            Paper No. 42              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                              Ex parte TAKASHI HOSAKA                                 
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1996-2702                                  
                             Application No. 08/093,983                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                 HEARD: MAY 9, 2001                                   
                                   _______________                                    
          Before THOMAS, RUGGIERO, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.           
          RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of           
          claims 4-12.  Claims 1-3 were canceled earlier in the prosecution           
          of the application.  Amendments after final rejection filed                 
          February 21, 1995, March 20, 1995, and May 1, 1995 were denied              
          entry by the Examiner.  A further amendment after final rejection           
          filed May 30, 1995 concurrently with the filing of the Appeal               
          Brief, which amended claims 4 and 10 and canceled claims 5, 8,              






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007