The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 42 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte TAKASHI HOSAKA _____________ Appeal No. 1996-2702 Application No. 08/093,983 ______________ HEARD: MAY 9, 2001 _______________ Before THOMAS, RUGGIERO, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection of claims 4-12. Claims 1-3 were canceled earlier in the prosecution of the application. Amendments after final rejection filed February 21, 1995, March 20, 1995, and May 1, 1995 were denied entry by the Examiner. A further amendment after final rejection filed May 30, 1995 concurrently with the filing of the Appeal Brief, which amended claims 4 and 10 and canceled claims 5, 8,Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007