The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for
publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 58
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SHIGEYOSHI WATANABE, TSUNEAKI FUSE,
KOJI SAKUI, MASAKO OHTA, YUKIHITO OOWAKI,
KENJI NUMATA and FUJIO MASUOKA
____________
Appeal No. 1996-3846
Application No. 08/251,649
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before JERRY SMITH, BARRETT, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges.
DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 and 37.
Claims 24-36 also remain in this application, but issues thereto have been addressed in a
separate decision mailed March 14, 2000.
We REVERSE.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007