Ex parte AFEYAN et al. - Page 1





                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                
                publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                        

                                                                                Paper No. 36                  

                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                         
                                                __________                                                    
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                            
                                           AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                                __________                                                    
                            Ex parte NOUBAR B. AFEYAN and NEAL F. GORDON                                      
                                                __________                                                    
                                            Appeal No. 1997-2373                                              
                                            Application 08/333,880                                            
                                                __________                                                    
                                                 ON BRIEF                                                     
                                                __________                                                    
                Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH and GRIMES, Administrative Patent                            
                Judges.                                                                                       
                GRIMES, Administrati ve Patent Judge.                                                         

                                           DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s                  
                final rejection of claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 19, 20, and 22-32.  Claims 1 and 29 are                 
                representative and read as follows:                                                           
                      1.     An apparatus for the separation of proteins in a sample, said                    
                             apparatus comprising                                                             
                             sample solution input means,                                                     
                             a first liquid chromatography column,                                            






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007