The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte DAVID M. GOLDENBERG and HANS J. HANSEN
__________
Appeal No. 1997-2393
Application No. 08/183,381
__________
ON BRIEF1
__________
Before McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge, ADAMS, and MILLS,
Administrative Patent Judges.
ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 1, 5-22, 24-28, 34 and 35, which are all the claims pending
in the application.
1 In accordance with 37 CFR 1.194(c), the Board decided that an oral hearing was
not necessary in this appeal. Therefore, appellants’ request for oral hearing was
vacated (Paper No. 31, mailed January 10, 2001).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007