The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 36 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte DONNA BOZYCZKO-COYNE, NICOLA NEFF, MICHAEL E. LEWIS, and MOHAMED A. IQBAL ____________ Appeal No. 1997-3275 Application No. 07/963,329 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before ROBINSON, MILLS, and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges. ROBINSON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claim 1. Claims 7 - 12, 14 - 39, and 41 - 46, the remaining claims pending in the application, stand withdrawn from consideration by the examiner and are not before us on appeal. Claim 1 reads as follows: 1. A method for promoting the survival of photoreceptors in a mammal, said photoreceptors being at risk of dying, said method comprising administering to said mammal an effective dose of Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007