Appeal No. 1997-3304 Page 9 Application No. 08/181,936 alleviate the particle build-up, costly maintenance cleaning schedule procedures have been implemented by semiconductor wafer manufacturers resulting in undesirable down-time." Thus, we find that all of the features of claims 1 and 8 are found in the appellants' description of the prior art with the exception of the tapered pipe outlet coupled to the inlet of the chamber. Both the application before us on appeal and Philipossian are in the same field of semiconductor wafer processing. Philipossian has recognized a problem associated with the flow of gas from inlet (15) into a furnace tube (10) for processing semiconductor wafers. More specifically, Philipossian (Fig. 8) shows that the problem involves turbulent, recirculating gas flow at the sharp corners of the inlet of the furnace. As explained in column 5, lines 22-35, the flow of gas passing the sharp corners of the inlet of Figure 8 experiences an abrupt change in velocity, as well as physical shape andPage: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007