Appeal No. 1997-3696 Page 9 Application No. 08/473,419 Rejection of Claim 65 over Ciszek in View of Naumann and Bult Claim 65 is directed to a method of making silicon (Si) and germanium (Ge) crystals by placing one of Si and Ge and water containing boron oxide in a vessel and cooling to crystallize the Si or Ge. The cooling progresses in a predominately horizontal direction from the bottom center of the vessel to the inner walls and then predominately vertically from the bottom toward the top of the vessel to form the crystal. According to the specification, at page 9, this progressive cooling is accomplished by imposing a cold spot on the bottom center of a crucible having a tapered bottom and tapered sides so that nucleation of the melt occurs at the bottom center. A uniform thermal gradient across the furnace and perpendicular to the crucible vertical axis is then imposed on the melt to accomplish crystallization in the vertical direction. Ciszek describes a process of growing Si crystals using a vertical temperature gradient cooling process. Appellant’s sole argument is that the combination of prior art does not teach or suggest the horizontal and vertical progressive cooling step of the claimed process. We agree with the examiner that such a cooling progression would have necessarily occurred in the process of Ciszek. Ciszek describes maintaining a vertical temperature gradient on the melt so that the molten Si solidifies from bottom to top (col. 2, lines 27-31, Figure 1, col. 3, lines 43-44). Ciszek also discloses forming the container with a conical bottom recess for a seed to be placed therein (col. 3, lines 5-7). The point of the conical bottom contains the seed and therefore crystallization will begin at the bottom center of thePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007