Ex parte KLOCEK - Page 11




               Appeal No. 1997-3696                                                                       Page 11                 
               Application No. 08/473,419                                                                                         


                              37 CFR § 1.196(b) also provides that the appellants, WITHIN TWO MONTHS                              

               FROM THE DATE OF THE DECISION, must exercise one of the following two options with                                 

               respect to the new ground of rejection to avoid termination of proceedings (37 CFR                                 

               § 1.197(c)) as to the rejected claims:                                                                             

                                      (1) Submit an appropriate amendment of the claims so rejected                               
                              or a showing of facts relating to the claims so rejected, or both, and                              
                              have the matter considered by the examiner, in which event the                                      
                              application will be remanded to the examiner. . . .                                                 

                                      (2) Request that the application be reheard under § 1.197(b) by the                         
                              Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences upon the same record. . . .                               

                      Should the appellant elect to prosecute further before the Primary Examiner pursuant to 37                  

               CFR § 1.196(b)(1), in order to preserve the right to seek review under 35 U.S.C. §§ 141 or 145 with                

               respect to the affirmed rejection, the effective date of the affirmance is deferred until conclusion of the        

               prosecution before the examiner unless, as a mere incident to the limited prosecution, the affirmed                

               rejection is overcome.                                                                                             

                      If the appellant elects prosecution before the examiner and this does not result in allowance of            

               the application, abandonment or a second appeal, this case should be returned to the Board of Patent               

               Appeals and Interferences for final action on the affirmed rejection, including any timely request for             

               rehearing thereof.                                                                                                 











Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007