Appeal No. 1997-3701 20
Application No. 08/141,457
is affirmed.
The rejection of claims 2 through 7, 11 through 13, 15 and 17 through 22
under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Lestina in view of Rody ‘271,
Rody ‘665, Negoro or J63/220142 is affirmed.
The rejection of claims 2, 4 through 7, 11, 12, 17 through 22 and 25 under 35
U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Lestina in view of Lok or Fuseya is affirmed.
The rejection of claims 2 through 7, 11, 12, 17 through 22 and 25 under 35
U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Lestina in view of Okamura or J61/250641
is affirmed.
The rejection of claims 2 through 7, 11 through 13, 15 and 17 through 22 under
35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Ogawa in view of Rody ‘271, Rody
‘665, Negoro or J63/220142 is affirmed.
The rejection of claims 2, 4 through 7, 11, 12, and 17 through 22 under 35
U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Ogawa in view of Lok or Fuseya is affirmed.
The rejection of claims 2 through 7, 11, 12, and 17 through 22 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Ogawa in view of Okamura or J61/250641 is
affirmed.
The decision of the examiner is affirmed.
Page: Previous 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007