The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 27
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte CHARLES VAN ASSCHE, DANIELLE LANDO
JEAN M. BRUNEAU, TONI A. VOELKER, and MONICA GERVAIS
__________
Appeal No. 1997-4272
Application 08/429,053
__________
HEARD: July 10, 2001
__________
Before ROBINSON, ADAMS, and GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judges.
GRIMES, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s
final rejection of claims 11, 23, and 24, all of the claims pending in the
application. The claims read as follows:
11. A hybridoma cell line selected from the group consisting of
SPA2-2-3, SPB3-2-19
SPA2-2-22, SPB5-2-10,
SPA2-2-25, SPB5-4-2,
SPB13-1-7 and
SPB13-2-2.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007